Forensic psychology as a comprehensive tool in contemporary judicial processes

Authors

Keywords:

forensic psychology, humanized justice, judicial conduct, professional ethics, social responsibility

Abstract

This argumentative essay aims to reflect on the dynamics of forensic psychology as an integral tool in contemporary judicial processes, adhering to the principles of objectivity, scientific rigor, and ethical responsibility, which guarantee respect for fundamental rights and the strengthening of justice in increasingly complex societies. Its development followed the dynamics of documentary research, using Boolean searches with the keywords: forensic psychology, judicial behavior, professional ethics, human behavior in court, procedural justice, and forensic assessment, in the databases of the Journal of Forensic Psychology, Scopus, Web of Science, Oñati Research Repository, ResearchGate, and Google Scholar.Among the conclusions, the strength of forensic psychology in a humanized justice system stands out, integrating scientific objectivity, ethics, and social sensitivity, thus ensuring contextualized decisions in complex societies. By interpreting human complexity in judicial contexts, it transcends the technical to become an unwavering exercise in fairness. The forward-looking vision of this argumentative essay projects the idea of ​​consolidating forensic psychology as a comprehensive field of action that innovates practices, strengthens humanized justice, and responds to emerging social demands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Angelo D'Addona Cillo, Universidad Yacambú. Barquisimeto, Venezuela

Licenciado en Psicología. Especialización en Psicología Clínica y Gerencia de Salud. Doctor en Gerencia. Posdoctorado en Políticas Públicas y Educación. Miembro fundador del sistema nacional de Orquestas Juveniles e Infantiles de Venezuela

References

Abudukelim, N. (2023). Legal psychology: Theintricateintersectionoflaw and human behavior. Journal ofForensicPsychology, 8(292).

Bergkamp, J., McIntyre, K. A., & Hauser, M. (2023). An uncomfortable tension: Reconciling the principles of forensic psychology and cultural competency. Law and Human Behavior, 47(1), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000507

Fucci, L. (2024). The legacy of Luhmann’s sociology of law: A trialogue among social theory, jurisprudence and empirical research. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 14(5), 1359-1383. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1923

Lartey, S. (2024). The impacts of forensic psychology on society. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/

Madureira, Á., Gomes, N. G. M., Dias-da-Silva, D., Azevedo, R. M. S., Fernandes, L. M., Dinis-Oliveira, R. J., & Caldas, I. M. (2023). Thecodeofethics and conductforforensicspecialists: A frameworkfromthe Portuguese AssociationofForensicSciences. ForensicSciences, 3(1), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci3010013

Poovarasan, P., & Jain, M. (2023). The role offorensicpsychology in profiling serial killers. Medico-Legal Update, 23(SpecialIssue), 1-5.

Prakash, B. (2023). Forensicpsychology and itsimpactonthe legal system. Journal ofCriminology and ForensicStudies, 5(1).

Rodríguez, H., Borches, F., & Iglesias, V. (2022). Human rights and humanitarian forensic action: The experience in Uruguay. Forensic Science Research, 7(3), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2022.2052591

Tomlin, J., Markham, S., Wittouck, C., & Simpson, A. (2024). Procedural justice and forensic mental health: Anintroduction and future directions. Medicine, Science and theLaw, 64(2), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024231206865

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

D’Addona Cillo, A. (2025). Forensic psychology as a comprehensive tool in contemporary judicial processes. Revista COMPSIDEA | Universidad Yacambú, 2(2), 77–90. Retrieved from https://revista.uny.edu.ve/ojs/index.php/compsidea/article/view/733