Organizational development: past, present and future for public and private organizations
Keywords:
evolutionary and conceptual architecture, ethical culture, organizational development, historical journeyAbstract
The evolutionary and conceptual architecture of Organizational Development (OD) constitutes a scenario of factual possibilities and a place for reflection in decision-making in the corporate sphere, as it allows the analysis of the elements that underpin administrative and managerial action, as well as the strategic mechanisms consistent with the progress of organizations. In this sense, the objective of this essay is to explore the concept of organizational development, through a historical tour of the stages and theories that have marked its evolution and impacted organizations over time, for which has proposed taking its approach through a sequential journey that analyzes and describes the theories of organizational development based on the classical (1950), neoclassical (1950-1990) proposals, chaordic organizations, blue organizations and disruptive organizations, also considering the deontological framework limited to organizational culture and the influences of Artificial Intelligence in global contexts. The conclusions allow us to point out that the OD of postmodernity has combined technology, human talent and strategies to provide responses consistent with the realities and problems of the turbulent context of the digital age, having to build an ethical culture that articulates business responsibility with the demands of the historical moment of the present and the future.
Downloads
References
Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
Burke, W. y Bray, D. (2005). Leader development: A practical guide. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
Cameron, K. y Schein, E. (2011). Creating a positive organizational culture: Evidence-based strategies to integrate and sustain change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davenport, T. y Kim, S. (2019). The future of management in the age of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 97(1), 58-72.
Fiedler, F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
George, G. y Joshi, A. (2018). The future of work and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Henderson, L. (1963). On the relation between industrial relations and economic conditions. American Economic Review, 53(2), 242-249.
Hernández, A. (2020). Las Organizaciones como Pilar Fundamental para el Desarrollo Organizacional desde las Eras: Clásica, Neoclásica y de la Información. Metrópolis, revista de estudios globales universitarios, 01(2), 1-26.
Kotter, J. (1969). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Kotter, J. (2012). Leading change: Why transformational efforts fail or succeed. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kotter, J. y LaKoudis, S. (2014). Why change fails: How to make decisions that matter. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 52-63.
Lewin, K. (1951). A social scientist looks at peace. Washington, DC: The National Planning Association.
Lewin, K. (1947). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
Rogers, C. (1964). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Simon, H. (1969). Models of man. New York: John Wiley y Sons.
Ulrich, D., Kaplan, R., LaBossiere, D. y Useem, M. (2009). The HR Value Proposition: Transforming People for Competitive Advantage. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Universidad TecVirtual del Sistema Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2012). Evolución histórica del desarrollo organizacional. https://tec.mx/es/negocios/licenciatura-en-desarrollo-de-talento-y-cultura-organizacional
Wheeler, K. y Wilson, T. (2013). Strategic Change Management: Creating Successful Organizational Change Initiatives. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Wright, T. y Nyce, D. (2012). Job satisfaction and organizational effectiveness. New York: Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Francisco J. Alarcón García
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.