Sailing in the midst of balance and conflict
Keywords:
conflict and balance, public administrationAbstract
In the context of coincidence and tensions in public dependencies in Venezuela, this study focuses on examining the diversity of the government system and highlights the importance of promoting cohesion and addressing challenges in its operation. The expression can be paraphrased as: "The goal is to explore the idea that there is a balance between agreement and disagreement in this context, to seek its philosophical foundations and evaluate how it can be used to improve public administration and address new problems." Some schools of thought, such as structuralism and positivism, subscribe to this perception of balance as an essential task of leadership. Additionally, an initial examination of many of the already published works and the empirical truths on which such assertions have been based is addressed. The conclusions underscore the complexity of administrative issues in this country, due to the constant need to maintain a balanced state that can ensure stability and adaptation, while managing conflicts within the current social political framework. The relevance of seeking effective solutions in Venezuelan organizations lies in including quality and continuous improvement in their processes.
Downloads
References
Ávalos, R. (2008). Innovación de la gestión pública: Análisis y perspectivas. Revista de Administración Pública. Nº 8.http://www.azc.uam.mx/publicaciones/gestion/num8/doc1.htm.
Bozeman B. y Crowther M. (2021). Public Administration in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities. Routledge,
Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo (CLAD). (2023). Plan estratégico 2024-2026. https://clad.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Planificacionestrategica-CLAD-2024-2026-Oficial.pdf
Coser, L. A. (1967). Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict. New York: The Free Press.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. Harper & Brothers.
Hayek, F. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hernández R., Fernández C. y Baptista M. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Keynes, J. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.
Martínez, M. (1996). Razones para un nuevo paradigma científico. En Comportamiento humano: nuevos métodos de investigación. México: Editorial Trillas.
Martínez, M. (2009). El proceso de nuestro conocer postula un nuevo paradigma epistémico. Revista Relea. Editorial CIPOST. http://prof.usb.ve/miguelm/procesonuestroconocer.html.
Marx, K. (1859). Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie [A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy]. Berlin: Franz Duncker.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Romero, J. (2004). El Nuevo Gerente Venezolano. Una epistemología para la administración pública venezolana. Caracas: Ministerio de Educación Universitaria, Consejo Nacional de Universidades, Oficina de Planificación del Sector Universitario
Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.
Smelser, N (2019). "Sociology: An Introduction." University of California Press.
Stoker, G. (Ed.). (2011). The politics of local governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Walras, L. (1874-1877). Éléments d'économie politique pure. Lausanne: Corbaz.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dilia Josefina Padrón Noriega
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.