Teaching and learning of Kant's formal ethics

Authors

Keywords:

ethics, teaching, learning, morals, autonomy

Abstract

Despite these criticisms, Kant's formal ethics remains an important contribution to moral philosophy. Its emphasis on duty, autonomy, and universal moral law offers us a solid framework for thinking about how to live a morally meaningful life. Kant's Formal Ethics, also known as Kantian deontology, is based on the idea that actions are good or bad in themselves, regardless of their consequences. This theory focuses on duty and universal moral law and maintains that moral decisions should be made in accordance with rational principles that can be applied to all rational beings. Let's imagine that we are considering whether to lie to a friend to spare them emotional pain. This critical argumentative essay on teaching and learning Kant's formal ethics, lying is always wrong, even if our intentions are good. This is because lying violates the universal moral law of treating people as ends in themselves and not as means to our own ends. Lying, even with good intentions, uses the other person as a means to achieve our own goal of sparing them pain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan Luis Avila Brito, Universidad Centro Occidental Lisandro Alvarado, Barquisimeto-Venezuela

Profesor de Filosofía del Decanato de Humanidades y Artes de la Universidad Lisandro Alvarado. Lcdo. en Filosofía. MSc. en Docencia Universitaria. Doctorante en ciencias de la Educación.

References

Fichte, J. The German Idealism Archive. https://archive.org/details/addressestogerma00fich

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Habermas, J. (1982) Moral Discourse and the Problem of Translatability: Lecture at the Goethe-Institut Paris, January 27, 1982. https://core.ac.uk/download/9821371.pdf

Habermas, J. (1983) Moral Discourse and the Problem of Translatability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kant, I. (1784) La enseñanza de la filosofía. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filosof%C3%ADa

Kant, I. (1785). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. https://posgrado.unam.mx/filosofia/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/KantFundamentacionseccion1pdf

Korsgaard, C. El imperativo kantiano de: una crítica por Ethics. https://archive.org/details/lecciones-de-etica-immanuel-kant

Mill, J. (1859) Utilitarismo. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/11224/11224-h/11224-h

O'Neill, O. (1982). Dos problemas en la enseñanza de la ética de Kant. Revista de Filosofía 33.(1), 5-25.

O'Neill, O (1997). Two Models of Virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, no. 1: 289-317. https://www.jstor.org/journal/philphenrese

O'Neill, O. (1998). Virtue and Dependence. Hypatia 13, 3: 47-62. https://www.jstor.org/journal/hypatia

O'Neill, O. (2010). Virtue and the Good Life. In The Routledge Companion to Ethics, edited by John Skorupski and Hiroaki Saito, 495-504. London: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Companion-to-Ethics/Skorupski/p/book/9780415415163

Sartre, J. (1943). El ser y la nada. https://elartedepreguntar.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/sartre-jean-paul-el-ser-y-la-nada.pdf

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

Avila Brito, J. L. (2024). Teaching and learning of Kant’s formal ethics. Revista Honoris Causa, 16, 132–146. Retrieved from https://revista.uny.edu.ve/ojs/index.php/honoris-causa/article/view/473